I mean really, now -- how sad must one's life have to be to make comments like these re: my coverage of the HRC Carolinas Dinner...
North Carolina is the pits. Jesse Helms, Mike Nifong, John Edwards... and Durham is the pits of the pits. Something like, third worst murder rate in the state? No more articles on North Carolina.
POSTED BY: JT | FEB 28, 2010 1:30:39 PM
Pam Spaulding is as useless and self-serving as Joe Solmonese. She is as much to blame for the sorry state of our civil rights movement as anyone at HRC. Her hypocrisy and lies aimed at anyone who questioned Obama's veracity before the primary election (you know, when it mattered) will not be forgotten.
POSTED BY: GAYLIB | FEB 28, 2010 2:58:59 PM
Believe me, Gaylib, Spaulding was only there for the buffet.
POSTED BY: JT | FEB 28, 2010 7:31:36 PM
LMAO!!!!! HA HA HA HA...
POSTED BY: TANK | FEB 28, 2010 7:34:58 PM
These were harvested from
Towleroad, btw, but you can find dung like this all over. Some of Andy's readers have an ax to grind with me for some reason. I see this sort of sentiment on occasion at other gay blogs and it irks me not because I have a thin skin -- trust me, I've been called worse.
The problem for me is that I'm friendly with most of these bloggers and they are with me as well; we often collaborate on actions on behalf of the equality movement, share tips, etc. I fail to understand what motivates this hostility in the comments.
Let's just say I don't want to see that kind of crap in comments here at PHB; if you have a criticism of someone's post or perspective (even when it comes to movement leaders, btw), I have to believe that Blenders can find an intelligent, reality-based way of analyzing and communicating your sentiments than what you see above. And it has nothing to do with clamping down expression or making it impossible to hold anyone accountable for what they put out there.
For every self-satisfying toss-off, how many calls do you think these commenters (JT, GAYLIB and TANK) made to their representatives about pro-LGBT legislation? How many even know who their state rep and senator are or visited with them? Even here, I see a fair amount of griping and moaning about the past -- as if we can change it -- and less strategy on how to stop a repeat failure or to actually achieve a sorely-needed victory.
The reason I bring this topic up is that on a regular basis I receive criticism for statements I've never made, positions I've never taken and insults or name-calling that are non-existent on my part. Where does it come from? The Blend comments.
For whatever reason, people looking for an easy way to discredit an essay or post of mine (or another barista) usually burrow into the comments to find "proof" of some malevolent hoohah, even if it's not anything anyone above the fold has said. I find it a bizarre phenomenon that some readers can't distinguish between a post and comments, but it happens so often that I have to believe people just see what they want to see.
Anyway, I'm just asking to pick up the discourse a bit and help with the problem-solving since we have a lot of work to collectively do ahead, given we have an administration running down the clock, a complex, often thorny relationship between the netroots and our "gatekeeper" organizations, and a well-organized right-wing Dominionist network of barely-tethered-to-reality folks who should not be able to scare our pols, but yet they are.
I know we have a lot of smart, politically aware Blenders here and we need all the brainpower we can get. Save your fire for deserving targets (also, no matter which side they are on). By all means hold me accountable, hold leaders accountable, but try to make your case in a way that is specific, fact-based and productive.
We put ourselves out here to take barbs, threats and all sorts of crap without the cover of anonymity, and at least on my part as a labor of love and desire for equality, certainly not to make a living off of it -- or belly up to a non-existent buffet, lol. They don't feed the journalists (at least not me) at these functions.